Appendicitis - Quick Consult
Last Updated / Reviewed: October 2024

Key History
Key Physical Exam
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnostic Testing
Clinical Risk and Safety Pearls
Pregnancy and Appendicitis
Treatment
ACEP Policy 

Key History

  • Periumbilical pain localizes to RLQ in 70% of cases.
  • Anorexia – 80%
  • Nausea/vomiting
  • Abdominal pain develops before nausea and vomiting
  • Constipation or diarrhea may occur
  • Low-grade temperature is common, but fever usually appears late
  • If fever higher than 39.4ºC (103ºF), consider perforated appendix
  • Non-specific complaints such as not feeling well, indigestion, and flatulence common
  • Urinary frequency, dysuria, tenesmus, or diarrhea common with appendix in the pelvic position
  • Abdominal dull ache can be associated with retrocecal appendix
Back To Top

Key Physical Exam

  • Tender abdomen – especially in the RLQ (highest predictive value)
  • Tenderness at McBurney’s point (point is 1/3 of the distance on a line starting from the anterior superior iliac crest to the umbilicus)
  • Rebound tenderness suggests perforation with peritonitis
  • Psoas sign - pain in RLQ with extension of the right hip
  • Obturator sign - pain in RLQ with internal rotation of hip
  • Rovsing’s sign - pain in RLQ with palpation of LLQ
  • Rectal examination contributes little to the assessment and is not routinely recommended.
Back To Top

Differential Diagnosis

Gastrointestinal Genitourinary Gynecological
  • Appendiceal neoplasm
  • Appendicitis
  • Cecal diverticulitis
  • Cholecystitis
  • Cholelithiasis
  • Constipation
  • Crohn's disease
  • Diverticulitis
  • Gastroenteritis
  • GERD
  • GI Bleed
  • Hepatitis
  • Intestinal obstruction
  • Intussusception
  • Irritable bowel syndrome
  • Meckel’s diverticulitis
  • Mesenteric adenitis
  • Omental torsion
  • Pancreatitis
  • Peptic ulcer disease
  • Perforated ulcer
  • Peritonitis
  • Small bowel obstruction
  • Typhlitis
  • Dysmenorrhea
  • Ectopic pregnancy
  • Endometriosis
  • Menorrhagia
  • Ovarian torsion
  • PID
  • Ruptured cyst
  • Tubal ovarian abscess
  • Twisted ovarian cyst
Cardiovascular Other
  • Diabetes ketoacidosis
  • Hemolytic uremic syndromes
  • Herpes zoster
  • Henoch-Schönlein purpura
  • Pneumonia
  • Sickle cell crisis
  • Streptococcal pharyngitis

Back To Top

Diagnostic Testing

Text / literature information and recommendations include:

Labs: When clinicians have a low pretest probability for appendicitis, the combination of a WBC count < 10,000/ mm3 and CRP < 8 mg/ L support the exclusion of appendicitis as a likely diagnosis.

  • WBC count – May be elevated or normal; a higher white count is associated with perforation.
  • C-reactive protein (CRP)
  • Urinalysis may show hematuria or pyuria – found in up to 1/3 of patients with appendicitis
  • B-hCG mandatory to rule out an ectopic pregnancy in females of childbearing age

Imaging: Obtain early surgical consultation before imaging in straightforward cases of suspected appendicitis in adults. Imaging is not universally necessary but may be of benefit to certain populations.

  • KUB. Plain radiography is generally not helpful. Findings are typically nonspecific. An appendicolith may be visualized in up to 50% of children with appendicitis.
  • Graded Compression Ultrasound. Ultrasound should be the initial imaging modality of choice in both pregnant females and children. It can similarly be considered in young, nonobese adults (typical findings in appendicitis are a thickened, noncompressible appendix > 6 mm in diameter). A meta-analysis by Doria et al. lists the overall sensitivity of ultrasound as 88% and 83% and its specificity as 94% and 93% for children and adults, respectively.
  • Noncontrast CT. Unenhanced, noncontrast abdominopelvic CT should be considered an acceptable imaging modality in the workup of acute appendicitis. There is controversy over the use of IV and oral contrast. Many centers continue to use one or both. CT demonstrates higher diagnostic accuracy than ultrasound or MRI. The disadvantage is the exposure to ionizing radiation.
  • MRI. MRI may be considered as another reliable imaging technology in the evaluation of acute appendicitis, particularly in pregnant women.
Back To Top

Clinical Risk and Safety Pearls

  • Abdominal pain usually occurs before nausea and vomiting, unlike gastroenteritis, where nausea and vomiting usually occur first.
  • Serial evaluations over several hours may improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with an atypical presentation.
  • The presence of appendicitis is not always apparent on the initial visit. Evaluate and re-evaluate. Document carefully. Demonstrate high-quality care and that the diagnosis was simply not apparent during your evaluation.
  • The urinalysis may show hematuria or pyuria, which is present in up to 1/3 of patients with appendicitis.
  • Order a β-hCG to rule out an ectopic pregnancy in females of childbearing age.
  • Taking a history of symptoms immediately prior to onset of pain is helpful in determining diagnosis.
  • Early in the presentation, the abdominal exam may be unremarkable.
Back To Top

Pregnancy and Appendicitis

See separate topic Appendicitis in pregnancy

Back To Top

Treatment

Common text / literature recommendations include:
  • Nonoperative management of acute appendicitis (IV antibiotics, admission) is gaining support. The patient should not have high-risk features on imaging (e.g., presence of a fecalith, abscess, tumor, fluid collection, or appendiceal diameter > 1.1 cm) and should be made aware of the risks of treatment failure and recurrent appendicitis, both of which generally require surgical removal of the appendix.
  • IV hydration
  • Pain medication. Opiate analgesia does not limit abdominal examination for a potential surgical condition.
  • When present, nausea can be treated with parenteral antiemetics.
  • Antibiotics should cover gram-negative aerobes, enteric gram-positive streptococci, and anaerobes. Pseudomonal coverage is not necessary for patients with mild to moderate disease severity and lack of healthcare–associated risk factors.
Back To Top

ACEP Policy

The most recent ACEP Guidelines (2023) make the following points:
  1. In adult patients, because of insufficient data, ACEP recommends not using clinical prediction rules to identify patients for home; no advanced imaging is required. In pediatric patients, clinical prediction rules can be used to rule stratify for possible acute appendicitis. However, ACEP recommends not using clinical prediction rules alone to identify patients who do not warrant advanced imaging for the diagnosis of appendicitis (Level B Recommendation).
  2. In pediatric patients with suspected acute appendicitis, if readily available and reliable, use right lower quadrant ultrasound to diagnose appendicitis. An unequivocally positive right lower quadrant ultrasound with complete visualization of a dilated appendix has comparable accuracy to a positive CT or MRI in pediatric patients (Level B Recommendation).
  3. In adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis, an unequivocally positive right lower quadrant ultrasound has comparable accuracy to a positive CT or MRI for ruling out appendicitis.
Back To Top

Abbasi N, Patenaude V, Abenhaim HA. Management and outcomes of acute appendicitis in pregnancy-population-based study of over 7000 cases. BJOG. 2014; 121:1509.

Carlber DF, Himelfarb NT. Acute Appendicitis. In: Walls R. Rosen's Emergency Medicine - Concepts and Clinical Practice. Elsevier Health Sciences. Kindle Edition. 2023: 4981-5023.

Dai L, Shuai J. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017;5(4):542-553.

Dierchks DB, Adkins EJ, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 2023;81:e115-e152. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.01.015.

Eng KA, Abadeh A, Ligocki C, et al. Acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, and MRI as second-line imaging tests after an initial US. Radiology. 2018;288:717-727.

Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorder-Starn MA, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(11):4668-4690.

Harnoss JC, Zelienka I, Probst P, et al. Antibiotics versus surgical therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials (PROSPERO 2015). Ann Surg. 2017;265(5):889-900.

House JB, Bourne CL, Seymour HM, Brewer KL. Location of the appendix in the gravid patient. J Emerg Med. 2014; 46:741.

Mahajan P, Basu T, Pai CW, et al. Factors associated with potentially missed diagnosis of appendicitis in the emergency department. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e200612.

Sartelli M, Baiocchi GL, Di Saverio S. Prospective Observational Study on acute Appendicitis Worldwide (POSAW). World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:19.

Talan DA, Saltzman DJ, Mower WR, et al. Antibiotics-first versus surgery for appendicitis: a US pilot randomized controlled trial allowing outpatient antibiotic management. Ann Emerg Med. Published online ahead of print Dec. 11, 2016. [PMID: 19733421].

Wong KE, Parikh PD, Miller KC, Zonfrillo MR. Emergency department and urgent care medical malpractice claims 2001-15. West J Emerg Med. 2021;22:333-338.

This is intended solely as reference material and is not a recommendation for any specific patient. The practitioner must rely upon his or her own professional judgment and medical decision-making to determine whether it is relevant in a particular case. Materials are derived from medical and nursing texts, medical literature and national guidelines and should not be considered complete or authoritative. Users must rely on specific patient presentation, experience and judgment when utilizing any of the information contained herein relative to an actual patient.

© 2008 - 2026 The Sullivan Group. All rights to TSG RSQ® Resources are reserved. Unauthorized copying or dissemination is prohibited. U.S. Patent No. 7,197,492