Mesenteric Ischemia – Quick Consult
Last Updated / Reviewed: October 2024

Definition
Key History
Key Physical Exam
Risk Factors for Mesenteric Ischemia
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnostic Testing
Clinical Risk and Safety Pearls
Treatment

Definition

Mesenteric ischemia is a reduction in intestinal blood flow. There are four causes of mesenteric ischemia: arterial emboli, arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis and non-occlusive ischemia. Mesenteric ischemia may lead to sepsis, bowel infarction, and death. If diagnosis takes place before infarction occurs, mortality is low. Diagnosis made after infarction results in mortality ranging between 70%-90%. Vague nonspecific symptoms make this a challenge to diagnose.

Intestinal ischemia can be divided into acute and chronic, based upon the rate of onset and the degree to which blood flow is compromised. Acute mesenteric ischemia refers to the sudden onset of intestinal hypoperfusion, which can be due to occlusive or nonocclusive obstruction of arterial or venous blood flow. Chronic mesenteric ischemia (also called intestinal angina) refers to episodic or constant intestinal hypoperfusion, which usually develops in patients with mesenteric atherosclerotic disease.

Back To Top

Key History

  • Acute severe onset of persistent abdominal pain.
  • Pain can be periumbilical, crampy, dull, diffuse.
  • Pain is often out of proportion to exam findings.
  • A patient with a history of sudden pain followed by forceful bowel evacuation with minimal abdominal signs should be evaluated for mesenteric ischemia.
  • Sudden onset of pain is often associated with embolic ischemic disease. A slower onset of pain is seen with vasculitis, thrombotic or non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia.
  • Pain often precedes vomiting.
  • Chronic mesenteric ischemia may present with abdominal pain after eating, weight loss, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea.
Back To Top

Physical Exam

  • The hallmark is pain out of proportion to exam findings.
  • The abdominal exam may be normal.
  • Abdominal distention – worsening as ischemia progresses
  • Heme positive stool – increases in frequency as ischemia progresses
  • Rebound, tenderness and guarding may be absent.
  • Later in the presentation the abdomen becomes distended, bowel sounds are absent and peritoneal signs are present.
  • Foul-smelling breath may be present.
Back To Top

Risk Factors for Mesenteric Ischemia

  • Advanced age – over 50
  • Arteriosclerotic disease
  • Cardiac arrhythmias
  • Cardiac valvular diseases
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • History of abdominal angina
  • History of abdominal malignancy
  • History of DVT or other venous thrombosis
  • Hypercoagulable state – paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, factor V Leiden mutation, myeloproliferative syndromes
  • Low cardiac output states
  • Systemic vasculitis
Back To Top

Differential Diagnosis

Gastrointestinal Genitourinary Other
  • Diabetes ketoacidosis
  • Hemolytic uremic syndromes
  • Henoch-Schönlein purpura
  • Herpes zoster
  • Pneumonia
  • Sickle cell crisis
  • Streptococcal pharyngitis
Cardiovascular

Back To Top

Diagnostic Testing

The recommended diagnostic tests for mesenteric ischemia, both acute and chronic, are primarily imaging-based, with a focus on identifying vascular occlusions and bowel ischemia.

  • Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA): The Society for Vascular Surgery recommends CTA as the preferred definitive imaging test for mesenteric artery occlusive disease (MAOD) due to its high sensitivity and specificity. CTA is particularly useful for visualizing the mesenteric vessels and assessing the extent of ischemia.

  • Duplex Ultrasound (DUS): DUS is an excellent screening tool for MAOD. It is non-invasive and can provide information on blood flow and vessel patency.

  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA): MRA can be considered as an alternative to CTA, especially in patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast. However, it is less effective in evaluating ischemic bowel changes compared to CTA.

  • Conventional Arteriography: This is reserved for cases where CTA or MRA are inconclusive or when endovascular intervention is planned. It provides detailed images of the mesenteric vasculature and can differentiate between occlusive and non-occlusive ischemia.

  • Laboratory Tests: While not diagnostic, elevated levels of D-dimer and lactate can support the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia. However, these tests lack specificity and should not be solely relied upon.
Back To Top

Clinical Risk and Safety Pearls

  • Immediate treatment of hemodynamic status (hypotension, CHF).
  • Any abdominal pain patient with a metabolic acidosis should be considered for mesenteric ischemia until proven otherwise.
  • Normal labs do not exclude the diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia.
  • A rectal exam may be of use in these patients with abdominal pain. A positive guaiac with no other apparent cause of GI bleeding may increase clinical suspicion for mesenteric ischemia.
  • Patients with mesenteric ischemia and signs of peritonitis generally require immediate surgical intervention.
  • This diagnosis is often delayed. Risk of delay can be reduced by maintaining a high clinical suspicion and use of early diagnostic imaging and early surgical consultation.
Back To Top

Treatment

Initial Management:

  • Resuscitation: Immediate fluid resuscitation and correction of metabolic acidosis are critical. Broad-spectrum antibiotics should be administered to prevent sepsis from bacterial translocation.

  • Anticoagulation: Systemic anticoagulation with heparin is initiated to prevent further thrombus formation.
Definitive Treatment:
  • Endovascular Therapy: For arterial embolism or thrombosis, endovascular techniques such as aspiration embolectomy, thrombolysis, and angioplasty with or without stenting are preferred due to lower morbidity and mortality compared to open surgery.

  • Surgical Intervention: Open surgical approaches—including embolectomy, bypass grafting, and resection of nonviable bowel—are indicated when endovascular options are not feasible or if there is evidence of bowel infarction. The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association recommend surgical revascularization in cases where endovascular therapy is not sufficient.

  • Second-Look Surgery: A planned second-look laparotomy within 24-48 hours is often necessary to reassess bowel viability and prevent further complications.
Special Considerations:
  • Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis: Systemic anticoagulation is the mainstay of treatment, with endovascular intervention reserved for cases not responding to anticoagulation.
Back To Top

Acosta S, Björck M. Modern treatment of acute mesenteric ischaemia. Br J Surg. 2014; 101:e100.

Carver TW, Vora RS, Taneja A. Mesenteric ischemia. Crit Care Clin. 2016;32(2):155-171.

Cudnik MT, Darbha S, Jones J, et al. The diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2013; 20:1087.

Expert Panel on Interventional Radiology; Lam A, Kim YJ, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiologic Management of Mesenteric Ischemia: 2022 Update. J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Nov;19(11S):S433-S444. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.006. PMID: 36436968.

Huber TS, Björck M, et al. Chronic mesenteric ischemia: Clinical practice guidelines from the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;73(1S):87S-115S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.029. Epub 2020 Nov 7. PMID: 33171195.

Kärkkäinen JM, Acosta S. Acute mesenteric ischemia (part 1) – Incidence, etiologies and how to improve early diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;31(1):15-25.

Molyneux K, Beck-Esmay J, Koyfman A, Long B. High risk and low prevalence diseases: Mesenteric ischemia. Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;65:154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 4. PMID: 36638612.

Monita MM, Gonzalez L. Acute Mesenteric Ischemia. [Updated 2023 Jun 26]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK431068/.

This is intended solely as reference material and is not a recommendation for any specific patient. The practitioner must rely upon his or her own professional judgment and medical decision-making to determine whether it is relevant in a particular case. Materials are derived from medical and nursing texts, medical literature and national guidelines and should not be considered complete or authoritative. Users must rely on specific patient presentation, experience and judgment when utilizing any of the information contained herein relative to an actual patient.

© 2008 - 2026 The Sullivan Group. All rights to TSG RSQ® Resources are reserved. Unauthorized copying or dissemination is prohibited. U.S. Patent No. 7,197,492