|
|
 |
| Physician Law Review |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| Pediatric Medical-Legal Issues |
| 3. |
Specific Situations Involving
Consent with
Minors. |
 |
|
1. The minor presents with a single
parent.
When parents are divorced, parental powers
are divided and the custodial parent and the
noncustodial parent may each have parental rights
and duties. The emergency physician should be
aware of the parental status.
Where the parents are divorced or
separated, the relationship of the child to the
presenting parent, relative, or friend should be
determined. The custodial parent retains the duty
to provide the child with medical care and the
right to give consent for treatment. Permission
need not be obtained from the non-custodial
parent.
If the parent without legal custody
presents with a minor for medical care, the
physician can assume that the accompanying parent
with possession of the minor has authority to
consent to treatment. Although technically that
parent may not retain the right or duty to provide
for medical care, practically speaking medical
care should be provided as necessary, and the
likelihood of resulting liability is
remote.
In joint custody arrangements, both
divorced parents have an equal responsibility for
making decisions that affect the child. Again, the
emergency physician may assume that the parent has
the authority to consent to treatment. The
divorced parent requesting treatment for a child
should represent, and the emergency physician
should document, that the parent has the legal
authority to give consent for the medical
treatment requested.
If the child is in need of immediate
treatment, or a delay for the purpose of obtaining
consent will adversely affect the child, the
physician should initiate care. In cases where
treatment is elective or the risk of treatment is
substantial, and parental status is uncertain, it
may be appropriate to request that the parent
produce written evidence regarding custody. The
emergency physician is not likely to run across
this situation very often.
2. The Minor Presents with an Adult Who
is Not a Parent.
If an emergency exists, or prompt treatment
is necessary, provide evaluation and treatment as
necessary, the emergency exception to consent
applies. Also, EMTALA requires a medical screening
examination. If the minor has an emergency medical
condition, EMTALA requires stabilizing treatment.
The emergency physician may also provide treatment
if the non-parent adult has guardianship or legal
custody with the right to provide for the child's
medical needs.
3. The Minor resides in a Foster
Home
When a child resides in an institutional
setting or foster home, the natural parents may or
may not have the legal right to consent to medical
care for the child. Again, the emergency exception
applies for emergent or prompt treatment. Several
state statutes provide that the individual or
institution with custody may consent to treatment
for medical care. If not governed by statute,
parents may need to consent for high risk and
elective procedures.
4. Minors in Detention
Facilities.
Parental consent is unnecessary for the
routine medical care of minors in detention
facilities. Again, the emergency exception
applies. Parental consent should be obtained for
high risk or elective
procedures.
5. Minors in Boarding Schools, Camps and
Related Institutions.
Parents retain the right to provide for the
medical care of children in boarding schools,
camps and other institutions. Typically, parents
must sign a blanket consent form whereby the camp
or school officials stand "in loco parentis", in
place of the parents, and may consent for routine
medical care. This blanket consent does not cover
non-emergency high risk or elective
procedures.
6. Runaway
Minors.
Children who run away from home, but plan
to return to the home, are not emancipated and may
not consent for their own medical care. Once
again, the emergency and other exceptions may be
applicable. However, absent an exception to the
consent requirements, efforts should be made to
contact the parents. In the event the runaway
requires routine medical care and will not
identify the parents, providing care is usually
acceptable, and low risk in terms of the
physicians exposure to liability. However, in an
elective or high risk situation legal counsel
should be consulted before providing
treatment.
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
|
|